Current:Home > ContactNY state asks court not to let Trump forgo $454M bond during fraud case appeal -Thrive Success Strategies
NY state asks court not to let Trump forgo $454M bond during fraud case appeal
View
Date:2025-04-17 15:46:31
NEW YORK (AP) — New York state lawyers urged an appeals court Wednesday not to buy former President Donald Trump’s claims that it’s impossible to post a bond fully covering a $454 million civil fraud judgment while he appeals.
The presumptive Republican nominee’s lawyers said earlier this week that he couldn’t find an underwriter willing to take on the entire amount. But the state is arguing that Trump and his co-defendants didn’t explore every option.
The “defendants fail to propose a serious alternative to fully secure the judgment,” Dennis Fan, a lawyer in the state attorney general’s office, wrote in papers sent to the appeals court.
He suggested those alternatives could include dividing the total among multiple bonds from different underwriters — or letting a court hold some of Trump’s real estate while he appeals. He’s challenging a judge’s ruling last month that he, his company and key executives inflated his wealth on financial statements that were used to get loans and insurance.
Messages seeking comment on the state’s new papers were sent to Trump’s attorneys. In a radio interview before the latest development, Trump reiterated his complaints about the case, the judgment and the bond requirement.
“They don’t even give you a chance to appeal. They want you to put up money before the appeal. So if you sell a property or do something, and then you win the appeal, you don’t have the property,” Trump said on WABC radio’s “Sid & Friends In The Morning.”
Under the judgment, Trump needs to pay more than $454 million in penalties and ever-growing interest; some of his co-defendants owe additional money. So far, courts have said that if the former president wants to as contributor?stave off collection while he appeals, he’ll have to post a bond for his entire liability.
Trump said last year that he has “fairly substantially over $400 million in cash.” But he’s now facing more than $543 million in personal legal liabilities from judgments in the civil fraud case, brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, and in two lawsuits brought by writer E. Jean Carroll. The advice columnist said Trump sexually assaulted her in the 1990s, then defamed her after she came forward in 2019.
He denies all the allegations.
Trump recently posted a $91.6 million appeal bond to cover the judgment, plus interest, in one of Carroll’s suits. In the other, he put over $5 million in escrow while he appeals.
But in a court filing Monday, Trump’s lawyers asked the state’s intermediate appeals court to excuse him from having to post a bond for the $454 million judgment in the business fraud case.
The attorneys wrote that “it is not possible under the circumstances presented.” They said underwriters insisted on cash or other liquid assets instead of real estate as collateral, which would have to cover 120% of the judgment, or more than $557 million.
Insurance broker Gary Giulietti — a Trump golf buddy who handles some of his company’s insurance needs and testified for him in the fraud trial — wrote in a sworn statement that “a bond of this size is rarely, if ever, seen.” The few provided go to huge public companies, Giulietti said. Trump’s company is private.
But Fan, the lawyer in the attorney general’s office, wrote Wednesday that “there is nothing unusual about even billion-dollar judgments being fully bonded on appeal,” citing a handful of cases. They largely involved publicly traded companies.
Fan asked the appeals court to turn down Trump’s request to hold off collection, without a bond, while he appeals.
If the appeals court doesn’t intervene, James can start taking steps March 25 toward enforcing the judgment. The attorney general, a Democrat, has said she will seek to seize some of Trump’s assets if he can’t pay.
___
Associated Press writers Michael R. Sisak and Jill Colvin contributed.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- What the Supreme Court's rejection of student loan relief means for borrowers
- Traveling over the Fourth of July weekend? So is everyone else
- Every Bombshell From Secrets of Miss America
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- The quest to save macroeconomics from itself
- Amazon Prime Day 2023 Beauty Deals: Shop Bestsellers From Laneige, Grande Cosmetics, Olaplex & More
- Prime Day 2023 Deal: 30% Off the Celeb-Loved Laneige Lip Mask Used by Sydney Sweeney, Alix Earle & More
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Save Up to $250 on Dyson Hair Tools, Vacuums, and Air Purifiers During Amazon Prime Day 2023
Ranking
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- How Decades of Hard-Earned Protections and Restoration Reversed the Collapse of California’s Treasured Mono Lake
- Boats, bikes and the Beigies
- Bitcoin Mining Startup in Idaho Challenges Utility on Rates for Energy-Gobbling Data Centers
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Environmental Advocates Call on Gov.-Elect Wes Moore to Roll Back State Funding for Fossil Fuel Industry
- After Two Decades of Controversy, the EPA Uses Its ‘Veto’ Power to Kill the Pebble Mine in Southwest Alaska
- The black market endangered this frog. Can the free market save it?
Recommendation
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Barbie's Simu Liu Reveals What the Kens Did While the Barbies Had Their Epic Sleepover
What you need to know about aspartame and cancer
From no bank to neobank
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
Amazon Prime Day 2023 Beauty Deals: Shop Bestsellers From Laneige, Grande Cosmetics, Olaplex & More
From no bank to neobank
10 million sign up for Meta's Twitter rival app, Threads